Research Objective

Project Description

A multi-pronged approach to effectively control the pea and lentil root rot complex that involves advances in genetics, breeding, agronomy and novel biotechnology applications.

Research Summary: Root Rot Severity by Pea Variety

Evaluation of root rot severity on prairie seed guide pea varieties in three Western Canadian nurseries over two years

Tom Warkentin1, Kishore Gali1, Tadesse Gela1, Ahmed Abdelmagid2, and Syama Chatterton3
1Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan
2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Morden, Manitoba
3Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta

Rationale

Pea breeders in Canada and internationally are aiming to develop varieties with improved root rot resistance. As root rot is a disease complex, with only partial resistance available to most of the individual pathogens, breeding for resistance is a major challenge. In the meantime, this project aimed to quantify the root rot resistance in existing pea varieties to allow producers to make informed decisions.

Objective

To evaluate root rot severity on prairie seed guide pea varieties in replicated field trials over two years and three root rot nurseries in Western Canada.

Methods

Over the 2024 and 2025 summer cropping seasons, 56 pea varieties from the three prairie seed guides representing essentially all varieties available for production in Western Canada were evaluated in replicated field trials. These trials were conducted in root rot nurseries at three locations: AAFC-Lethbridge, AAFC-Morden, and USask-Saskatoon. Varieties were planted in single-row plots (1.4 m in length with 30 cm between rows) with three replications. Standard agronomic practices for pea field trials in Western Canada were followed for land preparation, planting, and weed control. Irrigation was applied to promote root rot development. For disease assessment, up to 10 plants per plot were carefully excavated approximately five weeks after planting. Roots were washed and rated for root rot disease severity on a 1-7 scale, where 1 = no symptoms and 7 = complete plant mortality (Fig. 1). The disease severity ratings for each plot were converted to a disease severity index (DSI) by summing the product of the number of plants in each category by each disease rating category, dividing by the product of the total number of plants rated and the maximum disease scale, and multiplying by 100. The data were analyzed using the mixed model procedure in SAS 9.4.


Fig 1. Visual representation of 1-7 rating scale used for root rot scoring (photo: S. Chatterton).

Results

Fifty-six commercially available pea varieties were evaluated over two years in root rot nurseries at AAFC-Lethbridge, University of Saskatchewan, and AAFC-Morden. Root rot severity was moderately high at all sites, with moderate variation observed among locations and years, which is likely mainly attributable to differences in time of root rot assessment.

Each of the three prairie root rot nurseries contained multiple root rot pathogens. Aphanomyces euteiches was the most common pathogen in each nursery. After Aphanomyces, the nurseries contained varying levels of several Fusarium species including F. avenaceumF. solaniF. acuminatumF. oxysporumF. redolens, and other minor root rot pathogens such as Didymella pinodella.

The 56 varieties differed significantly in their root rot score in the combined analysis of the six station-years. The mean root rot disease severity index (DSI) for each location over the two years ranged from 63.8–95.7% in Lethbridge, 59.0–78.6% in Saskatoon, and 55.0–80.9% in Morden. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among varieties at all locations (Table 1). The overall mean DSI across all varieties and locations was 73.9%, with individual cultivar means ranging from 62.3% to 81.1%. The coefficient of variation (CV) for DSI was acceptable at each of the six station-years supporting the reliability of the trials.

PI 660729 and PI 660736 are sources of partial resistance to Aphanomyces used by plant breeders (McGee et al., 2012). These two varieties had the lowest mean DSI of the 56 varieties, with their average score being 63.3% (Table 1). Nine Western Canadian varieties (CDC Rider, CDC Canuck, CDC 6482-4, AAC Planet, AAC Lorlie, Boost, CDC Dakota, CDC Blazer, and CDC Forest) had mean DSI within the LSD of these partially resistant checks.

Conclusion

This trial assessed the root rot score of the commercially available pea cultivars in Western Canada in three dedicated pea root rot nurseries over two growing seasons. Reliable data were obtained from all six trials. Varieties were ranked for their mean overall disease severity index, and these data can be utilized by growers in variety selection if root rot is a major consideration in their region. Varieties purposely-bred for improved root rot resistance are expected to be commercialized in Western Canada in the coming years. These varieties are expected to have lower disease severity index than the best of the varieties currently available.

Table 1. Mean root rot disease severity index (DSI %) of 56 pea varieties evaluated across three locations (SA: Saskatoon, MO: Morden, and LE: Lethbridge) in 2024 and 2025. Varieties are ranked from lowest DSI to highest DSI overall mean. The table includes the coefficient of variation (CV), significance levels (p < 0.05), and least significant difference (LSD) for each environment, as well as the annual mean and overall mean.


Variety

Root rot (RR) Disease Severity Index (DSI %)

2024

2025

Overall Mean

SA

MO

LE

Mean

SA

MO

LE

Mean

PI 660736 check

86

50

63

66

47

63

65

58

62.3

PI 660729 check

81

41

51

58

48

69

95

71

64.2

CDC Rider

80

55

78

71

59

72

87

63

67.1

CDC Canuck

82

55

83

74

52

74

96

63

68.6

CDC 6482-4

80

66

78

75

52

74

91

62

68.7

AAC Planet

79

59

74

70

51

73

81

68

69.5

AAC Lorlie

82

64

61

69

52

70

89

70

69.8

Boost

84

53

68

68

54

85

78

72

70.3

CDC Dakota

82

57

81

74

45

83

73

67

70.4

CDC Blazer

75

63

72

70

43

78

93

71

70.9

CDC Forest

79

52

82

71

46

79

90

71

71.2

CDC 5791

84

58

70

71

51

79

87

72

71.7

CDC Limerick

75

60

68

68

58

85

84

76

71.8

CDC Dakota-2

84

58

67

70

56

83

83

74

72.0

CDC Canary

86

65

79

77

59

77

100

68

72.2

Melrose check

86

42

93

74

56

75

80

70

72.3

CDC Huskie

77

59

79

72

51

75

93

73

72.4

CDC Sonata

78

74

74

75

63

67

84

71

73.3

CDC Lewochko

77

51

84

71

68

81

79

76

73.6

CDC Jasper

79

63

79

74

56

74

89

73

73.6

AAC Carver

87

58

70

72

49

85

93

76

73.7

CDC Spruce

78

55

85

73

64

66

95

75

73.7

AAC Profit

83

64

80

76

51

78

86

72

74.1

CDC Saffron

84

61

68

71

62

80

88

77

74.1

P1222-2923

83

53

80

72

64

83

84

77

74.3

DL Goldeye

81

81

75

79

50

78

81

70

74.3

Caphorn

87

55

81

74

55

79

90

74

74.5

EP_8971

88

62

78

76

52

76

90

73

74.5

AAC Chrome

84

57

78

73

63

82

83

76

74.6

CDC Greenwater

84

63

75

74

65

74

86

75

74.6

CDC Spectrum

87

57

74

72

61

81

88

77

74.6

CDC Meadow

88

57

77

74

57

80

89

75

74.7

CDC Inca

76

49

88

71

51

87

95

78

74.7

CDC Engage

79

52

88

73

57

82

90

76

74.7

CDC Boundless

84

68

69

74

57

77

92

76

74.8

CDC Tollefson

79

74

74

76

61

74

87

74

74.9

Prostar

83

51

85

73

58

78

94

77

75.1

DL Lacross

79

77

68

75

60

81

87

76

75.4

CDC Mosaic

80

60

90

77

62

79

83

74

75.6

CDC Amarillo

82

67

91

80

55

68

90

71

75.8

DL Delicious

87

70

71

76

63

76

86

75

75.8

AAC McMurphy

84

59

86

76

52

79

95

76

76.1

CDC Hickie

80

54

85

73

63

88

85

79

76.2

CDC Golden

74

87

84

82

54

75

87

72

76.9

CDC 5845

79

62

84

75

69

79

89

79

77.1

6242-1

83

61

94

79

61

81

82

75

77.2

AAC Aberdeen

82

65

89

78

55

87

86

76

77.2

AAC Ardill

88

61

96

81

54

78

89

73

77.4

CDC Raezer

84

58

87

76

73

75

89

79

77.8

CDC Citrine

80

54

84

73

67

86

94

83

77.9

Abarth

87

65

78

77

60

84

93

79

78.0

CDC Striker

79

59

82

73

70

77

98

82

78.0

AAC Julius

83

72

91

82

51

79

94

75

78.4

DL190006

93

57

97

82

55

80

94

76

79.6

CDC Horizon

77

69

93

79

59

82

97

79

80.0

AAC Beyond

88

62

90

80

69

80

96

82

81.1

Overall Mean

82.1

60.6

79.4

74.0

57.1

78.0

88.2

73.7

74.0

CV

7.7

19.8

14.3

14.2

19.9

10.6

10.0

17.5

15.8

P-value (p<0.05)

0.02

0

<.0001

0.0186

0.01

0

<.0001

5E-04

0.0017

LSD

8.9

17.3

24.1

9.9

15.0

10.9

11.6

9.8

8.0

 

Acknowledgements

The technical support from staff at AAFC-Lethbridge, AAFC-Morden, and the Crop Development Centre are gratefully acknowledged. This study is part of the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture Strategic Research Initiative project ‘Accelerate discovery of root rot solutions for pea and lentil in Saskatchewan’ led by Sabine Banniza, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, and funded by the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, Alberta Pulse Growers, Manitoba Pulse and Soybean Growers, Western Grains Research Foundation, and Results Driven Agriculture Research.

Reference

McGee RJ, Coyne CJ, Pilet-Nayel ML, Moussart A, Tivoli B, Baranger A, Hamon C, Vandemark G, and McPhee K (2012) Registration of pea germplasm lines partially resistant to Aphanomyces root rot for breeding fresh or freezer pea and dry pea types. Journal of Plant Registrations, 6:203–207, doi: 10.3198/jpr2011.03.0139crg.

Related Research