Peas Root Rot
Download PDF

Evaluation of root rot severity on prairie seed guide pea varieties in three Western Canadian nurseries over two years

Tom Warkentin1, Kishore Gali1, Tadesse Gela1, Ahmed Abdelmagid2, and Syama Chatterton3
1Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan
2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Morden, Manitoba
3Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta

Rationale

Pea breeders in Canada and internationally are aiming to develop varieties with improved root rot resistance. As root rot is a disease complex, with only partial resistance available to most of the individual pathogens, breeding for resistance is a major challenge. In the meantime, this project aimed to quantify the root rot resistance in existing pea varieties to allow producers to make informed decisions.

Objective

To evaluate root rot severity on prairie seed guide pea varieties in replicated field trials over two years and three root rot nurseries in Western Canada.

Methods

Over the 2024 and 2025 summer cropping seasons, 56 pea varieties from the three prairie seed guides representing essentially all varieties available for production in Western Canada were evaluated in replicated field trials. These trials were conducted in root rot nurseries at three locations: AAFC-Lethbridge, AAFC-Morden, and USask-Saskatoon. Varieties were planted in single-row plots (1.4 m in length with 30 cm between rows) with three replications. Standard agronomic practices for pea field trials in Western Canada were followed for land preparation, planting, and weed control. Irrigation was applied to promote root rot development. For disease assessment, up to 10 plants per plot were carefully excavated approximately five weeks after planting. Roots were washed and rated for root rot disease severity on a 1-7 scale, where 1 = no symptoms and 7 = complete plant mortality (Fig. 1). The disease severity ratings for each plot were converted to a disease severity index (DSI) by summing the product of the number of plants in each category by each disease rating category, dividing by the product of the total number of plants rated and the maximum disease scale, and multiplying by 100. The data were analyzed using the mixed model procedure in SAS 9.4. 

Fig 1. Visual representation of 1-7 rating scale used for root rot scoring (photo: S. Chatterton).

Results

Fifty-six commercially available pea varieties were evaluated over two years in root rot nurseries at AAFC-Lethbridge, University of Saskatchewan, and AAFC-Morden. Root rot severity was moderately high at all sites, with moderate variation observed among locations and years, which is likely mainly attributable to differences in time of root rot assessment.

Each of the three prairie root rot nurseries contained multiple root rot pathogens. Aphanomyces euteiches was the most common pathogen in each nursery. After Aphanomyces, the nurseries contained varying levels of several Fusarium species including F. avenaceum, F. solani, F. acuminatum, F. oxysporum, F. redolens, and other minor root rot pathogens such as Didymella pinodella

The 56 varieties differed significantly in their root rot score in the combined analysis of the six station-years. The mean root rot disease severity index (DSI) for each location over the two years ranged from 63.8–95.7% in Lethbridge, 59.0–78.6% in Saskatoon, and 55.0–80.9% in Morden. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among varieties at all locations (Table 1). The overall mean DSI across all varieties and locations was 73.9%, with individual cultivar means ranging from 62.3% to 81.1%. The coefficient of variation (CV) for DSI was acceptable at each of the six station-years supporting the reliability of the trials.

PI 660729 and PI 660736 are sources of partial resistance to Aphanomyces used by plant breeders (McGee et al., 2012). These two varieties had the lowest mean DSI of the 56 varieties, with their average score being 63.3% (Table 1). Nine Western Canadian varieties (CDC Rider, CDC Canuck, CDC 6482-4, AAC Planet, AAC Lorlie, Boost, CDC Dakota, CDC Blazer, and CDC Forest) had mean DSI within the LSD of these partially resistant checks.

Conclusion

This trial assessed the root rot score of the commercially available pea cultivars in Western Canada in three dedicated pea root rot nurseries over two growing seasons. Reliable data were obtained from all six trials. Varieties were ranked for their mean overall disease severity index, and these data can be utilized by growers in variety selection if root rot is a major consideration in their region. Varieties purposely-bred for improved root rot resistance are expected to be commercialized in Western Canada in the coming years. These varieties are expected to have lower disease severity index than the best of the varieties currently available. 

Table 1. Mean root rot disease severity index (DSI %) of 56 pea varieties evaluated across three locations (SA: Saskatoon, MO: Morden, and LE: Lethbridge) in 2024 and 2025. Varieties are ranked from lowest DSI to highest DSI overall mean. The table includes the coefficient of variation (CV), significance levels (p < 0.05), and least significant difference (LSD) for each environment, as well as the annual mean and overall mean. 

Variety Root rot (RR) Disease Severity Index (DSI %)
2024 2025 Overall Mean
SA MO LE Mean SA MO LE Mean
PI 660736 check 86 50 63 66 47 63 65 58 62.3
PI 660729 check 81 41 51 58 48 69 95 71 64.2
CDC Rider 80 55 78 71 59 72 87 63 67.1
CDC Canuck 82 55 83 74 52 74 96 63 68.6
CDC 6482-4 80 66 78 75 52 74 91 62 68.7
AAC Planet 79 59 74 70 51 73 81 68 69.5
AAC Lorlie 82 64 61 69 52 70 89 70 69.8
Boost 84 53 68 68 54 85 78 72 70.3
CDC Dakota 82 57 81 74 45 83 73 67 70.4
CDC Blazer 75 63 72 70 43 78 93 71 70.9
CDC Forest 79 52 82 71 46 79 90 71 71.2
CDC 5791 84 58 70 71 51 79 87 72 71.7
CDC Limerick 75 60 68 68 58 85 84 76 71.8
CDC Dakota-2 84 58 67 70 56 83 83 74 72.0
CDC Canary 86 65 79 77 59 77 100 68 72.2
Melrose check 86 42 93 74 56 75 80 70 72.3
CDC Huskie 77 59 79 72 51 75 93 73 72.4
CDC Sonata 78 74 74 75 63 67 84 71 73.3
CDC Lewochko 77 51 84 71 68 81 79 76 73.6
CDC Jasper 79 63 79 74 56 74 89 73 73.6
AAC Carver 87 58 70 72 49 85 93 76 73.7
CDC Spruce 78 55 85 73 64 66 95 75 73.7
AAC Profit 83 64 80 76 51 78 86 72 74.1
CDC Saffron 84 61 68 71 62 80 88 77 74.1
P1222-2923 83 53 80 72 64 83 84 77 74.3
DL Goldeye 81 81 75 79 50 78 81 70 74.3
Caphorn 87 55 81 74 55 79 90 74 74.5
EP_8971 88 62 78 76 52 76 90 73 74.5
AAC Chrome 84 57 78 73 63 82 83 76 74.6
CDC Greenwater 84 63 75 74 65 74 86 75 74.6
CDC Spectrum 87 57 74 72 61 81 88 77 74.6
CDC Meadow 88 57 77 74 57 80 89 75 74.7
CDC Inca 76 49 88 71 51 87 95 78 74.7
CDC Engage 79 52 88 73 57 82 90 76 74.7
CDC Boundless 84 68 69 74 57 77 92 76 74.8
CDC Tollefson 79 74 74 76 61 74 87 74 74.9
Prostar 83 51 85 73 58 78 94 77 75.1
DL Lacross 79 77 68 75 60 81 87 76 75.4
CDC Mosaic 80 60 90 77 62 79 83 74 75.6
CDC Amarillo 82 67 91 80 55 68 90 71 75.8
DL Delicious 87 70 71 76 63 76 86 75 75.8
AAC McMurphy 84 59 86 76 52 79 95 76 76.1
CDC Hickie 80 54 85 73 63 88 85 79 76.2
CDC Golden 74 87 84 82 54 75 87 72 76.9
CDC 5845 79 62 84 75 69 79 89 79 77.1
6242-1 83 61 94 79 61 81 82 75 77.2
AAC Aberdeen 82 65 89 78 55 87 86 76 77.2
AAC Ardill 88 61 96 81 54 78 89 73 77.4
CDC Raezer 84 58 87 76 73 75 89 79 77.8
CDC Citrine 80 54 84 73 67 86 94 83 77.9
Abarth 87 65 78 77 60 84 93 79 78.0
CDC Striker 79 59 82 73 70 77 98 82 78.0
AAC Julius 83 72 91 82 51 79 94 75 78.4
DL190006 93 57 97 82 55 80 94 76 79.6
CDC Horizon 77 69 93 79 59 82 97 79 80.0
AAC Beyond 88 62 90 80 69 80 96 82 81.1
Overall Mean 82.1 60.6 79.4 74.0 57.1 78.0 88.2 73.7 74.0
CV 7.7 19.8 14.3 14.2 19.9 10.6 10.0 17.5 15.8
P-value (p<0.05) 0.02 0 <.0001 0.0186 0.01 0 <.0001 5E-04 0.0017
LSD 8.9 17.3 24.1 9.9 15.0 10.9 11.6 9.8 8.0

Acknowledgements

The technical support from staff at AAFC-Lethbridge, AAFC-Morden, and the Crop Development Centre are gratefully acknowledged. This study is part of the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture Strategic Research Initiative project ‘Accelerate discovery of root rot solutions for pea and lentil in Saskatchewan’ led by Sabine Banniza, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, and funded by the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, Alberta Pulse Growers, Manitoba Pulse and Soybean Growers, Western Grains Research Foundation, and Results Driven Agriculture Research. 

Reference

McGee RJ, Coyne CJ, Pilet-Nayel ML, Moussart A, Tivoli B, Baranger A, Hamon C, Vandemark G, and McPhee K (2012) Registration of pea germplasm lines partially resistant to Aphanomyces root rot for breeding fresh or freezer pea and dry pea types. Journal of Plant Registrations, 6:203–207, doi: 10.3198/jpr2011.03.0139crg.

Download PDF

Related Resources